
I was recently asked a question, “I’m wondering how much of your time is spent using photo editing software vs. film?” In reality, if I were processing my own film I spend much less time in photo editing software than I spent in the darkroom and I was only doing some basic processing in the darkroom.

To me, the real question is does it matter? If a photographer is producing beautiful images does it matter if it is film or digital? Does it matter if the photographer spends a lot of time in the darkroom or photo editing software? What matters, to me, is the final result. What matters is the time spent composing and setting up “the shot” in the beginning. What matters is recognizing the moment. What matters is developing the eye of an artist.
Starting with a well-composed photograph, of an interesting subject, executed well the result is often beautiful. Masters, such as Ansel Adams spent hours in the darkroom as did many of the so-called masters of photography.
Be it film or a digital sensor doesn’t matter. Each is just a medium for recording a scene. Both are similar, yet different. In the end, a beautiful photograph is a beautiful photograph. Just think about the time spent by Michelangelo or Rembrandt creating their paintings.
One of the biggest problems with photographic art being recognized as true art is that many think it is instantaneous. Just point the camera at a subject or scene and push the button. That doesn’t create beautiful art. Beautiful art is skillfully and carefully crafted using all the tools necessary.

It doesn’t matter the length of time spent creating the art. What matters is the art. Nothing more nothing less.













