
I mentioned yesterday that I watched a webinar given by a well-known photographer. During the webinar a question was asked, “is that a composite or in-camera shot” pertaining to a photograph he showed. His first response was, why does that matter? This is exactly what I say about such photographs when people ask, is that Photoshopped?
With film, you don’t hear people asking how the image was processed in the darkroom. Questions such as, what chemicals did you use? Did you dodge and burn? How long did you process the film in the chemical wash? What were your settings on the enlarger?
I’m not sure about others but I work to create art not a copy of reality. As good as my camera is, it still cannot create the art I envision. Sometimes, I underexpose a shot to preserve highlights and then bring up the exposure of the subject in post-processing. Sometimes, there are elements that cannot be cleaned up that get included in a shot that distracts from my vision and those elements are removed in post-processing. Sometimes, the lens is too sharply focused and I envision a softer focus which is achieved in post-processing.
In the end, you either like a photograph or you don’t. If you like it does it matter how it was processed? Likewise, if you don’t like a photograph it also doesn’t matter. It’s all subjective and about the art, not the process of creating the art.













