
I frequently search for podcasts to listen to while I work. Yesterday, I found a podcast, Outdoor Photography hosted by Brenda Petrella. Unlike many of the other podcasts, I listen to on occasion this one wasn’t riddled with advertisements or wander completely off the topic of photography. During the first episode, I listened to Brenda interviewed a photographer named Sean Bagshaw. During the interview the discussion turned to working on photographs in Photoshop. Sean was quick to point out he doesn’t like the term process or post process because it sounds like something you do in a factory. He said he preferred the term, develop. I like that. After listening to that podcast, I have decided I am going to start to refer to working on photographs in software as developing.
Developing a digital image is not that different than developing film, the only difference is film is done with chemicals, light, and other physical tools whereas digital is done electronically with a computer and software. While it is true that post-processing and developing can mean the same thing it is a matter of words. The term developing an image sounds more traditional and maybe better accepted. After all, the toughest group to view our photographs are other photographers.























