Tag: quality

I started to think about this topic yesterday when we got new cellphones. What prompted me to think about the future of photography was how far cellphone cameras have progressed in the past few years. A cellphone photo was tiny and quite often blurry. The photograph of the “Zink” Photo paper was taken with an iPhone 13 Pro Max in a room lit only by the light of my computer monitors.

Last night after I was able to switch over to the new cellphone (transferring all the data, contacts, apps, etc.) I just played around with the camera for a moment. The whole concept of cellphone photography/videography has taken an enormous leap forward. It is little wonder why so many people no longer use dedicated cameras to photograph events or people as casual users, but are we approaching the realm of replacing dedicated cameras with smart devices? Where we this all be in 20 or 50 years? Will we go the way of the Polaroid and instant prints using the Zink paper or will we continue as we have?

If you’re not having fun with your photography you may be doing it wrong. To me, it doesn’t matter if it is your job or hobby. If you are not having fun taking photographs I believe your creativity is lost. There are a few exceptions though. Photographing war, violence, natural disasters, and human or animal suffering are a few I can think of.

Think about it. When you are having fun doing something it becomes easier to think, “Hey let’s try something”. When you are not having fun the project becomes mundane and more like work. It could be that I have reached a point in my life where I have decided that there is too much going on in the world to do too many things I don’t enjoy. I may not have taken many photographs lately because I have allowed myself to be overwhelmed by things I don’t enjoy. In order to correct this, I going to focus on things I enjoy.

Find fun in your photographic art, even if it is a serious portrait session or the hunt for beautiful landscapes. Once the fun is back the creativity is endless.

Do you or can you recognize your own photographs? I’ve taken tens of thousands of pictures and if I go through my Lightroom catalog I occasionally come across a photograph that isn’t mine. Most of the time I don’t even have to check the metadata. I just don’t recognize the image. A bit of it is I, at least, vaguely remember what I have taken photographs of but a bit is a style of my own that I have come to recognize. I probably couldn’t describe my style to anyone I just remember it.

I’ve talked to many photographers. A lot of them, especially newer photographers often say they don’t have a style but it is that they just don’t recognize their style as a style, or are they too busy attempting to copy the style of others? I believe this is the inherent problem with attempting to copy the style of others, you forget to or just don’t add your own twist to it. I guess there is nothing wrong with that it’s just not for me. In fact, when I have mentored others I make a point of telling them my goal isn’t to make them a copy of myself but to help them find their own style.

To me, it is like recognizing your family. Often you don’t even have to see their faces to know who the people are in the photograph. My photographs, in a way, are like family. I know them even if I can’t tell you why.

Even if you don’t think you have a style, you probably really do have one. Look closely at your photos and you will probably start to recognize commonalities in your images.

I frequently go through previous work and reimagine its development. Some of it comes from new techniques I’ve learned some of it comes from just playing around with different looks. Many of the photographs I reimagine were never publicly shared because the initial process just didn’t work out.

I have no problem visualizing previous work in a new way. New features in the software, new techniques learned new ideas and new concepts. For me, if I’m not learning more I’m not progressing as a photographer or artist. It’s all about progress and personal growth.

My suggestion to all photographic artists is to keep an open mind to new techniques, new concepts, and new styles. Don’t stay in the same place.

Now I just need to get my crap together and work to get more current photographic work done and apply what I have discovered to new work.

I never really thought about this before yesterday, color doesn’t exist in reality. We have electromagnetic radiation bouncing off objects and the different wavelengths which we perceive as color. Does this mean that black and white photography is really the true reflection of reality? As such is it all just an illusion? Does reality really matter and the biggest question of all, who cares?

I believe many get caught up in what is reality without realizing that much of reality is perception. I have heard the phrase, “perception is reality” and I used to really hate that term as it seemed to be used in an attempt to alter my thoughts and beliefs. As I have grown older I have come to realize the truth in that phrase, with one addition. Perception can become reality. Accepting this “truth” has changed my view on many things, especially in creating art. My goal most often with my photography is not to capture a scene or subject as it truly may exist in the natural universe but how I perceive the scene or subject. My perception becomes my reality.

I often wonder, can we really create an original photograph, or is everything an imitation or copy of something that has been done before? There are few locations on the planet that haven’t been photographed, but are there any truly new concepts? It is said that in writing books there are seven basic plots. Is this true with visual arts? Are there really new ideas? I’m not sure of the answer but it isn’t likely to stop me from my attempt to create a unique look, after all, no one else has all my experiences. They may have similar experiences but not the same. This is why I believe it is important to put your own style into your art and not merely attempt to copy the work of someone else, regardless of how good and creative that work may be. I don’t believe there is shame in getting inspiration from the work that was created before our own as long as we put a bit of our personality into it.

One of the traits I am personally proud to have is that I don’t really have limits to my creativity. There are techniques I like and use often but sometimes I “play” with different processes.

I guess my process is less reality-based and more imaginative-based. For me sometimes reality sucks. Reality is something that I want to escape from. I would like only to watch documentary movies and television or only read historical factual books. Yes, sometimes it is wonderful to see a documentary or show based on real events. Yes, sometimes it is wonderful to read a book on facts and history.

A few years ago I became interested in philosophy. I hated philosophy in college but I love a philosophical conversation not. I periodically read books such as The Republic. I like things that make me think more deeply. I like things that are ambiguous. I like things that are conceptual or with a subliminal message. At the same time, I often look for beauty in nature and reality.

All this leads to my biggest problem which is staying focused on a project. I am beginning to get a grasp on how to channel my thoughts and creative ideas but it is very much a work in progress.

Years ago I was gifted a camera, but I didn’t receive a call to be a photographer. That call didn’t come until later. A couple of years after getting my first camera I did start to become more and more interested in photography. I had acquired some more gear and even a simple black and white darkroom. Then the call faded. I had cameras but little interest in making photographs outside of vacation or special events. That call finally arrived in the spring of 2005. It isn’t that I didn’t have a “telephone” I didn’t have it turned on. In fact, I wasn’t even particularly interested in art or music. Oh, I had art on the walls of my house and I listened to music but it wasn’t a focus of my lifestyle. I’m not sure what prompted my interest in photography. I remember going to a camera store, Ritz Cameras. I found a camera I wanted to buy. I got a Nikon D50 with an 18-55mm “kit lens”.

I would take photographs of just about anything that crossed my path. I was operating in mostly a variety of automatic modes but it didn’t matter. Soon, I acquired more gear. The call had come in. I was 46 years old at the time. Many of the other photographic artist types I have met had a much earlier beginning, many when they were children.

My point is that no matter how old you are when the call arrives work it. Develop a passion for your art. You’re never too old and remember, always always be willing to move outside of your comfort zone and styles. Try new things.

This past weekend I volunteered to work at the gallery of a contemporary photography group of which I am a member. First off, it was very slow as far as visitors. One person needed to borrow a pen and piece of paper because he hit a parked car with his vehicle and another was another member who came to see the exhibit since he missed the opening of it, otherwise, I was alone with the exhibit which was billed as small works where no print was larger than an 11 x 14.

What I found very interesting were the selections the members made to display. This wasn’t a juried show but members could select up to three prints to be included in the show. Now I’ve only been a member for a short time but I did have some very interesting conversations with other members. All the work was very good albeit an eclectic collection. I was going to put items in the show but absentmindedness was to blame for my neglect (in other words I forgot).

I spent a total of 5 hours looking through the gallery. There were some photo books from a free film project and the last juried show. Spending that amount of time with various works of art in a relatively small area I had lots of time to really study the artwork. I found this to be an awakening of sorts. Hanging out with other creative photographic artists and viewing their work is somewhat inspiring. I’ve found very little criticism on whether about the processes of others. Some work only in film, others only in digital, and then there are those who do both. Some are more purist photographers while others are more post-development. Thus far, I haven’t found it to be like social media groups or photography clubs of which I have been a member where there is a very discernable division between photography styles.

One thing is for sure and that is I feel much more confident with my style and my work. Who knows maybe this is the motivation and inspiration I have needed for so long.