Fine art photography is more than just art

The Path

I would argue all day long that photography can be art, but at the same time, I would say that not all photographic art is fine art. A fine art photograph, like any piece of art fine art, is something more. It MUST convey the artist’s interpretation of a subject or scene not merely be a reproduction of a subject or scene. A fine art photograph should take the viewer beyond mere reproduction. I see all sorts of photos including those the photographer calls fine art photography but often the photo looks to merely seeing a scene/subject and taking a picture of the same. I feel as if the artist needs to be telling us something more. I believe the fine art photograph needs to talk to me and embrace my imagination.

It often helps us with an artist statement or, at very least, a title. This gives us something to understand what the artist wished to convey. What do you think? I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Comments

One response to “Fine art photography is more than just art”

  1. Brian Avatar

    I love a photograph which can inspire interest or introspection. When a judge is viewing an image, the first thing they look at is the title. A perfect title requires imagination. Some people can think of an appropriate title quickly, but it takes me much more time.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.