I choose to be a photographic artist not just a photographer

Over the years I have chosen to not be called a photographer, but rather a photographic artist. I have found that when I use the term photographer, the first thing many people ask is, “Do you do weddings?” No, I don’t do weddings.

I currently work in a school environment and a few days ago was picture day. Two photographers from a somewhat well-known school photography company came and took the school children’s photographs. It is assembly line photography. Everything looks the same just a different person.

As a photographic artist, I can have multiple styles and looks. I can change midstream and go to a completely different look.

I’m not locked into a “signature look”. I can go with what my mood is at the time. I can change the look on a whim. For me, each image is a reflection of me and my mood and personality. I relish the freedom of expression I get by calling myself a photographic artist.

I don’t think I am better than a photographer, I’m just different. I don’t care what others call themselves. It doesn’t matter to me. What matters to me is the work. I love, and I mean truly love looking at good photographs. I spend a lot of time looking at the work of other photographers and photographic artists. Go forth and create wonderful work and let your imagination and creativeness run wild.

Comments

2 responses to “I choose to be a photographic artist not just a photographer”

  1. American Socialite Avatar
    American Socialite

    Beautiful photographs. I’m wondering how much of your time is spent using photo editing software vs. film. Thanks!

    Like

    1. The Photographer Clay Avatar
      The Photographer Clay

      I actually spend less time in editing software than I spent in the darkroom

      Like

Leave a reply to American Socialite Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.