Art versus journalism

This is one of those never-ending debates in photography. Should photography be considered art or journalistic documentary? Can it be both? Can a person practice both? I typically consider myself more of an artist. I don’t let reality hold me back. I love to create. I work to get what I consider the best starting point and then do my editing. This often involves bracketing shots, working exposure, composition, focus points, and depth of field. For me, it is all about the art with an occasional documentary look.

Even photos I take and share that look more like documentary style are altered. My reality is often much different than others. I work to re-create how a scene or subject looked in my mind, disregarding distractions such as leaves or branches that are “out of place” to my eye.

This mindset even applies to photographing people. I look for dramatic lighting but I am not beyond making the light more dramatic in my post-processing.

For me, it is about vision and emotion rather than merely recording a scene.

Comments

One response to “Art versus journalism”

  1. Brian Compton Avatar
    Brian Compton

    Hi, Clay,

    I also love to play with new features of software such as LR & PS. There are times when it is necessary to eliminate distracting objects to make the image more appealing, from my perspective.

    If I were doing forensic photography of a crime scene, that would be different.

    A photographer or painter can add or subtract items, change the lighting, etc. (“artistic license”?).

    Brian

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Brian Compton Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.